In the course of devotions this week I was reading Mark 5, when Jesus raised the daughter of Jairus from the dead. It occurred to me there are several incidents in Scripture where the act of eating is used to underscore the essential humanness — or non-humanness — of the person in view.
Then He took the child by the hand, and said to her, “Talitha, cumi,” which is translated, “Little girl, I say to you, arise.” Immediately the girl arose and walked, for she was twelve years [of age]. And they were overcome with great amazement. But He commanded them strictly that no one should know it, and said that [something] should be given her to eat. (Mark 5:41-43)
What a strange afterthought — here, Jairus, your daughter lives … and she needs something to eat.
I think Jesus was giving the parents an immediate testimony that their daughter was truly restored to life, not rising as a spirit. Jesus did a similar thing when God raised Him from the dead:
Now as they said these things, Jesus Himself stood in the midst of them, and said to them, “Peace to you.” But they were terrified and frightened, and supposed they had seen a spirit.
And He said to them, “Why are you troubled? And why do doubts arise in your hearts? Behold My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself. Handle Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see I have.”
When He had said this, He showed them His hands and His feet. But while they still did not believe for joy, and marveled, He said to them, “Have you any food here?” So they gave Him a piece of a broiled fish and some honeycomb. And He took [it] and ate in their presence. (Luke 24:36-43)
I wonder if this is more significant because, just before this meeting with the disciples, Jesus had joined with the men He met on the road to Emmaus for supper. While He opened their eyes to recognize Him as He blessed the bread and gave it to them, it seems that He did not eat on that occasion, and in a very spirit-like manner disappeared from their sight (Luke 24:30-31). That may have been the cause of speculation when they reported their encounter to the other disciples.
Both the Old and New Testaments speak of feasting in heaven (Isaiah 25:6 and Revelation 19:9 come to mind), which underscores the actual, bodily resurrection of the saints.
On the other hand, the Angel of the Lord made the opposite point to Manoah, the father of Samson:
Then Manoah said to the Angel of the LORD, “Please let us detain You, and we will prepare a young goat for You.” And the Angel of the LORD said to Manoah, “Though you detain Me, I will not eat your food. But if you offer a burnt offering, you must offer it to the LORD.” (For Manoah did not know He [was] the Angel of the LORD.) (Judges 13:15-16)
While the Angel speaks of a burnt offering, it is clear that he considered Manoah’s invitation to be offering dinner, not worship. Gideon, on the other hand, plainly called the meal he brought an offering, and knew that he was addressing an angel (Judges 6:17-22).
However, there is one incident which doesn’t follow the pattern. When Abraham was visited by the Lord in the plains of Mamre (Genesis 18), the three men who appeared to him accepted his offer of food:
And he took butter, and milk, and the calf which he had dressed, and set [it] before them; and he stood by them under the tree, and they did eat. (Genesis 18:8)
So, as usually the case with really interesting little discoveries in Scripture, it probably is best not to read more than an occasional correlation from this one.